State of the Union 2015

YouTube: White House

"A clear vision of where we are taking this country."*

* Republican Response(paraphrased) 

The Ed Show
Rachel Maddow
Morning Joe

PoliticsNation

Obama polling
Romney running*

1-20-15
NOW Dean on Obama Running.

~ searching for link
*still in the process of search for previous references to the Obama search or education of America.
...and Romney running. 

MLK Day

Remembering Martin Luther King Jr.

Robert Parry on Neo-Cons*
Matt Taibbi the Pope and Charlie
Chomski on Obama's Historic Move

NFRY:  No context provided. 

1-20-15
Robert Reich on Compassionate Conservativism
Jeb and Mitt's change of tune belied by reference to Obama. 
Juan Cole on French Diversity and Immigration

*Syria Shift

RIT

RadIslTer[!] 


wRIT?


{lab: TH,WT, D',G'[R]}


(FP!)


Reading is Terrorism?  ~3


i.e. insert two

Parsing Systems

P.S.  Are we Charlie?  Or why aren't we French? 
It is a shame that fame comes under such horrible circumstances.

Not to bury the lede in nuance or labels, but I intend to more heavily edit** insertion of links for the time being.  Unfortunately I may have now buried more nonsense*.  I am not Forbes, The Atlantic or Slate.  Not that I have placed then in any order of sense.  My point was to review any prior use elsewhere that I have yet to place in context~. 

*not that I have parsed the nonsense, be it the Daily Caller, the New York Times, David Brooks or any of their words.

** carefully filter

*~* I am not a Paper Bird! 
Je ne pax The String! 
Nor Car Tunist. 
R we all sat-irists?

RFD? ?[?]  Not to withdraw weapons.



1-13-15 The vig ? ** not fully read IRONY!

I am not Forbes ~!~  Context:  This is a difficult read.  Is it really necessary to disseminate examples to determine that the killings are not justified? Maybe we are more French than we might like[!]  Further context:  Images and cartoons in reaction to the massacre are not comparable to the images or cartoons that Charlie Hebdo publishes.  Not that I have avoided either, I just wished to review my m-beds.  i.e. links I have yet to parse or deconstruct
 
(Now, Romney? The Reid Report, pre-The Cycle. Un-parsed: -)

Parlay vous?

Decent dissent without descent* is hard work.

Or... Reading between the lines... [!]


* (a. Pink Floyd, b. An Inconvenient Platonics? c. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy)


[!] Yes, parlay of parlez and fed-upism.
RFD ?  ?


No!  :

Rest In Peace

Resolution In Progress ? 
Rest in Peace !
Resolution in Process ?

(Re:labels.)

Perspectivism

A preemptive thought intruded before I could go further. Where are the women?  I will leave that for another time.
So it is with only slight further ado, that I note the heading, as the only context for the mentioning** of a few blogs. 

Contrary Brin
Pax On Both Houses

From Gender to Genre:
Darwins-god
A forth perspective.*

The first two especially, respect style and perspectivism, not to mention** subject matter. 
The third is a stretch on a few counts*, let alone complexity. A runner-up for 4th might be:

*still in processing

1-6-15
[Pardon the spacing anomalies.]
Re:runner-ups. 
^*^ 3rd and 4th anachronism.** Counter-popperism? 
** asteri(s)cal anachronism ^context~mentioning^
(s) type-O?/ asterical(spell check in-operable[!]?)
[R.I.P. Not a shot at irony[!], police labor strife*** works where justice fails?
*** not a strike @ hard work, they do. [!](?) 

Rest In Peace

Second officer laid to rest from tragic slaying. 


Officer Wenjian Liu
Officer Rafael Ramos

R. I. P.

Resolution in Progress.

Resolution

This may seem belated but it falls in with the post-emption buy in. 
(What the fork or why the fractal.) (in process)

1-7-15: To not post every day.

WTF!

What the fork!
Or why the fractal?
Buy chiminy[!]*
*




The Domino is the ...irony? analog?^
Or Bane or?















[Route of the dilemma? Parsin'or conjugation[!] ]
or reassemble that remark.




[...  ever wonder about a word like pre-emption? (Hyphenated's or not?)
... And then wonder how post-emption might work? ]
  
Root, route, rout?


Seg-way to... the google of post~emption. 


(FP!) (1)buy, (2) A, B, C(c), D(d). (3)A, B, C, D~/~G'Ribble, E /The Irony of the Message, F F'n P[!], G, H(h). (4)Ctrl F Cricket? (5) or Forensics Matter.
6^ : ana-logue? Knot the point[!].

(FP!)

Writer than Right ~ Righter than Write
(Escher then White!)


MC: Off the Cuff
EB: Proof of Life...
[lemma](sc)lab]
You can't stop terrorism with a Cruz epistle!

F'n to Fb[!]

Footnotes to Facebook ? [!]  (~).*




*( OW! ).


(F'n)

Read or Ship?

Not fully sewn or C-sawed[!]


Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!]   You got Ed!


Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?


Pardon the irony or mixed parody, which would you rather have, more Republican in the form of X, or Democracy in the form of Y? Still frackin’ about the Bane or poll-R-ization?  AKA~
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
　Post-Ship or Precalculus of WOT?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:  
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .  

Satire is not a two way street.

That is the proposal.  That it is unlikely to be possible for there to be equivalence on the right and left.  Now that is an awkward statement or phrasing of the* obvious. 

There is difficulty comparing anything at opposite ends of the political spectrum, let alone** middles.  The Olbermann/Beck comparison is along the lines of journalism more than parody.  Limbaugh along the lines of Colbert more than Olbermann.  It may be along the lines of who is pulling whose leg for whom.  That's the gravitas!

To paraphrase the difficulty for which there is more work needed, parody may be more difficult for those in power. But this may confuse parody with satire, or either with having a point, confounded by the(~)irony of being direct about the point in a world of hypocrisy.

(FP1)
(awkward): A. "Comedian Rush Limbaugh", B. Whatcha gonna do about it?  

*12-29-14 (of the): A. Para-model, b. ..., c. ..., d. ..., e. ... ,  f. ... ,  g. ...   h. BtU  , I. What the Beck? , j. ... , k., (l.)  ..., (m.) ... (note font size A. & I. = Normal Ctrl F "of the left")
** or muddle is the hume or...(FP!)
( comparison) : A. The Billy Club..., B.Genre Clash, C.  
(gravitas): A. 4Mat, B. Way, Too Point Oh?, C. Or ask for a third, D. Funneling Crisis?
ticket: A. Hump Day?, B.  The New Compendium, C. Primary Boogeyman, D. Not to make light..., (...)  R. Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? ... (...)

(FP!) It is important to note that I have barely finished processing much of what I have included above @ ** in particular.


PaxOnBothHouses

Add caption

*** not inserted but re~spectrum 'tween *&**.

"laid to rest"

"paying respects" to Rafael Ramos.

An injustice to Mani!

Many key an that is. 

(RSN)
(Huff / Po-e?)
(Salon)

12-29-14 : to be medi8ted to FB. 'n Andrea Mitchell.
Robert Reich 'n Simon Johnson
A, B, C, D? or too reads ?[!]

Moratorium!

What's a torium!!!!


Two NYPD officers were gunned down in their own squad cars on Saturday afternoon. Words are far from sufficient to express the horror and tragedy that such an event represents.  My above(~)nuance is only a beginning but is unfortunate that it seems to have become an instant blame game.  It seems that if freedom of speech is not protected only criminals will be using it. (punctuation is a beach!) 


(~)also below[!]
Bob Hebert on MSNBC: needs a refresher on Manichean.*

[!] See beach and lede or ship!

12-23-14 2+* inserts
* he is not alone !

WOB-L-E

War on blood[!]


[!] = emphasis sarcasm/irony/rhetorical


BOP ~ blood on policy!We got it!
That's the ticket[!]


(FP1):to file A., B., C., D., E. 
AM/RFD-MSNBC
(fp2): to file A. Attention Fine Print Readers!, B., C.
(fb3): In regards to lede or ship... A. Running Joke , B. We got it!


Two NYPD officers were gunned down in their own squad cars on Saturday afternoon. Words are far from sufficient to express the horror and tragedy that such an event represents.  My above nuance is only a beginning.  It is unfortunate that it seems to have become an instant blame game.  It seems that if freedom of speech is not protected only criminals will be using it.